Regular re-occurring retrospectives DURING the course of the project is a key reason why Agile helps make projects successful. Why wait until the end of a project to learn what worked well and what could have been improved when you can adjust things during the course of the project? Project "post-mortems" held only at the END of a project should be a practice that dies along with its morbid name!
But, no matter what approach I took for the retrospective, I ran into one nagging problem... people seemed to struggle to remember what happened during the last iteration. Or, if they did recall anything, it was usually much more of the negative rather than the positive. An effective retrospective should highlight and celebrate our successes as much as our failures - so it was of little help when people would only remember the failures!
So - soon after starting up my latest project, I decided to try to tackle this critical problem. How could I truly maximize the benefit that regular retrospective meetings can provide for a team if the team either couldn't remember key issues or were really more focused on getting back to work on their current stories?
Enter the W.Ack.Hm (pronounced "Whack'em!") White Board!
I simply took a portable whiteboard and drew three columns with the following names:
But, instead of filling these columns in during the retrospectives, the board was simply left out near our story board wall for the team to enter items IN REAL TIME. There was no more need to open up those cob-web covered doors to the memories of our last iteration!
If someone was having problems checking in their code since the source control server seemed to be lagging, they could simply go up to the W.Ack.Hm board and write that issue under the "Ack!" column! If someone found a way to resolve a design problem that was nagging them for the last few days, they could go up to the board and write that under the "Wahoo!" column - perhaps even showing it off to the team right then and there! If someone was reading up on a new technology that they thought could help us, they could write it in the "Hmm..." column.
Grant - why didn't you just use more generic names like "Positives," "Negatives," and "Thoughts?" Well - first of all, you can't get a creative name for the board with those three words!! And, "Wahoo! Ack! Hmm..." are much more fun and active words - hopefully inviting you to write something down under those columns. Making things fun is a subtle but very important difference in getting more participation from your team!
Okay Grant - I get it! How did it work out?
To my delight, after the first week implementing the W.Ack.Hm White Board, there were 6 items in the "Wahoo!" column, 10 items in the "Ack!" column and 3 items in the "Hmm..." column. By contrast, the last retrospective I ran with the team resulted in 1 positive and 5 negative items being listed - and no thoughts on what could be done to improve things. By using the W.Ack.Hm white board, we had more than tripled the amount of items we discussed during our retrospective!! How's that for maximizing value from your retrospective!!!
Another benefit from this approach is that there was no longer a need for a long, drawn out period collecting feedback from the team since you already have most of the items to discuss already written down. I still allocate some time for the team to enter additional items to the board - but that phase has been trimmed down to be only a few minutes at most! We're now able to finish our retrospective meetings in 30 minutes flat - and they feel like a much more efficient use of our time since we are actively discussing the items on the board for almost the entire meeting.
As with any retrospective meeting, they key to making them work for you is to collect that information and create action items that are worked on as soon as your team has the ability to do so. Thus, I ensure that the contents and discussions around the W.Ack.Hm board are collected and stored within a WIKI page that I've setup for our retrospectives. I also proceed to enter action items to resolve any issues into our issue tracking system where we can then proceed prioritize and deliver on those issues, adding direct value to the project.
I can honestly say that some of the most critical risks to the project have been mitigated by items and discussions brought up during our retrospectives. To my surprise as well, we've also been able to implement most of our "Hmm..." suggestions as well! Results will vary based on your team and project schedule - but if you aren't actively working on issues resulting from your retrospectives, why even have them if they aren't going to provide any value?
If you've gotten this far into reading the post, I can only hope that you are thinking about instituting this for your team as well... may it help your team out as much as it has helped ours!
Tuesday, October 20, 2009
More Effective Retrospectives With The W.Ack.Hm White Board
Posted by Grant H. Joung at 10:20 PM
Labels: ack, action items, agile, fun, hmm, post-mortem, real time, retrospectives, risk mitigation, w.ack.hm, whack'em, white board, wiki, yahoo
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
I'll try this iteration. Let's see how it goes. My team is quite bad at retros, maybe this will help them get more interested.ReplyDelete
Great idea, can I syndicate it on retrosepectivewiki.org?ReplyDelete
Nice. I work on a distributed team and we take a similar approach using CardMeeting [http://www.cardmeeting.com/], opening a new 'meeting' at the beginning of an iteration for people to put their cards up as they see fit during the iteration. Then we have all of the cards ahead of the retro.ReplyDelete
Rob - yes - please feel free to re-syndicate it as long as credit/link is provided back to my blog! Thanks!ReplyDelete
Pete - interesting approach for a distributed team - will definitely remember that!ReplyDelete
anonymous - I'm curious how it will also work out for your team... please post results here after your first iteration using it!ReplyDelete
sir i am doing research on estimation for agile can yo help me apart playing pokerReplyDelete
Thanks for sharing this.ReplyDelete